1980 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2003 BMW 520
To start off, 2003 BMW 520 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 2,170 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW 520 weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1980 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2003 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Autobianchi A 112 | 2003 BMW 520 | |
Make | Autobianchi | BMW |
Model | A 112 | 520 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 2170 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 167 HP |
Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 223 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 70 L |