1980 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2004 MG ZT
To start off, 2004 MG ZT is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG ZT weights approximately 825 kg more than 1980 Autobianchi A 112.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 MG ZT has automatic transmission and 1980 Autobianchi A 112 has manual transmission. 1980 Autobianchi A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 MG ZT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Autobianchi A 112 | 2004 MG ZT | |
| Make | Autobianchi | MG |
| Model | A 112 | ZT |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 2495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 225 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1485 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 65 L |
