1980 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 855 kg more than 1980 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2005 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Autobianchi A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Nissan X-Trail has automatic transmission and 1980 Autobianchi A 112 has manual transmission. 1980 Autobianchi A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Nissan X-Trail will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Autobianchi A 112 | 2005 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Autobianchi | Nissan |
Model | A 112 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 60 L |