1980 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1980 Bentley Mulsanne is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Bentley Mulsanne (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Bentley Mulsanne should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Bentley Mulsanne weights approximately 55 kg more than 1960 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Bentley Mulsanne | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Bentley | Cadillac |
Model | Mulsanne | 62 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 2195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 3310 mm |