1980 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1980 Bentley Mulsanne is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Bentley Mulsanne (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Bentley Mulsanne should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Bentley Mulsanne weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1967 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Bentley Mulsanne | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Bentley | Triumph |
| Model | Mulsanne | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 104.1 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2700 mm |
