1980 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 1968 Holden Belmont
To start off, 1980 Bentley Mulsanne is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Bentley Mulsanne (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Bentley Mulsanne should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Bentley Mulsanne weights approximately 960 kg more than 1968 Holden Belmont. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Bentley Mulsanne | 1968 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Bentley | Holden |
Model | Mulsanne | Belmont |
Year Released | 1980 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 3043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2830 mm |