1980 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Bentley Mulsanne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Bentley Mulsanne would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Bentley Mulsanne weights approximately 1070 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1980 Bentley Mulsanne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Bentley Mulsanne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Bentley Mulsanne | 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Bentley | Chrysler |
Model | Mulsanne | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1980 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2630 mm |