1980 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 2000 Ford 24.7
To start off, 2000 Ford 24.7 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Bentley Mulsanne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Bentley Mulsanne would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Bentley Mulsanne (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2000 Ford 24.7. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Bentley Mulsanne should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford 24.7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Bentley Mulsanne weights approximately 1042 kg more than 2000 Ford 24.7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Bentley Mulsanne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Bentley Mulsanne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford 24.7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Bentley Mulsanne | 2000 Ford 24.7 | |
Make | Bentley | Ford |
Model | Mulsanne | 24.7 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2580 mm |