1980 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Bentley Mulsanne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Bentley Mulsanne would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Bentley Mulsanne (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Bentley Mulsanne should accelerate faster than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Bentley Mulsanne weights approximately 1806 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Bentley Mulsanne | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Bentley | Westfield |
| Model | Mulsanne | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 444 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2320 mm |
