1980 Bitter SC vs. 2002 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2002 Mazda AZ is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Bitter SC would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Bitter SC weights approximately 600 kg more than 2002 Mazda AZ.
Because 2002 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Bitter SC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mazda AZ has automatic transmission and 1980 Bitter SC has manual transmission. 1980 Bitter SC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mazda AZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Bitter SC | 2002 Mazda AZ | |
| Make | Bitter | Mazda |
| Model | SC | AZ |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2968 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2370 mm |
