1980 Bitter SC vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Bitter SC would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (201 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1980 Bitter SC. (178 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1980 Bitter SC.
Because 1980 Bitter SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Bitter SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Bitter SC | 2012 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Bitter | Audi |
| Model | SC | A6 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2968 cc | 2800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 201 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4915 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2911 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 75 L |
