1980 BMW 316 vs. 1948 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1980 BMW 316 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 BMW 316 (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 40 kg more than 1980 BMW 316.
Because 1948 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 BMW 316. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1948 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1948 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 BMW 316. (124 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1948 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
1980 BMW 316 | 1948 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 316 | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1980 | 1948 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1573 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2040 mm |