1980 BMW 628 vs. 1954 Riley RM A
To start off, 1980 BMW 628 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 BMW 628 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 BMW 628 weights approximately 225 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 BMW 628 | 1954 Riley RM A | |
| Make | BMW | Riley |
| Model | 628 | RM A |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 181 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2870 mm |
