1980 BMW 628 vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1980 BMW 628 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 BMW 628 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 BMW 628 (181 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 BMW 628 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 BMW 628 weights approximately 794 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 BMW 628 | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | BMW | DAF |
Model | 628 | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1980 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 33 L |