1980 BMW 628 vs. 1976 Mazda RX-3

To start off, 1980 BMW 628 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 BMW 628 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 BMW 628 (181 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 BMW 628 should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 BMW 628 weights approximately 610 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 BMW 628 (240 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1980 BMW 628 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-3.

Compare all specifications:

1980 BMW 628 1976 Mazda RX-3
Make BMW Mazda
Model 628 RX-3
Year Released 1980 1976
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2786 cc 1964 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 181 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 240 Nm 135 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1460 kg 850 kg
Vehicle Length 4760 mm 4090 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1600 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 2320 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 65 L