1980 BMW 628 vs. 2005 Mazda Etude
To start off, 2005 Mazda Etude is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 BMW 628. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 BMW 628 would be higher. At 2,787 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 BMW 628 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 BMW 628 (181 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Etude. (99 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 BMW 628 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Etude. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 BMW 628 weights approximately 425 kg more than 2005 Mazda Etude. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 BMW 628 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 BMW 628. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 BMW 628 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Etude. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1980 BMW 628 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Etude.
Compare all specifications:
1980 BMW 628 | 2005 Mazda Etude | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 628 | Etude |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2787 cc | 1594 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1045 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |