1980 BMW 725 vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 BMW 725. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 BMW 725 would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 318 more horse power than 1980 BMW 725. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1980 BMW 725.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 628 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 BMW 725. (215 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 BMW 725.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 BMW 725 | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | 725 | XKA |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2495 cc | 4399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 466 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 843 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2590 mm |
