1980 BMW 725 vs. 2001 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2001 Toyota Celica is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 BMW 725. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 BMW 725 would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 BMW 725 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Celica (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1980 BMW 725. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1980 BMW 725.
Because 1980 BMW 725 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 BMW 725. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 BMW 725 (215 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Celica. (180 Nm). This means 1980 BMW 725 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1980 BMW 725 | 2001 Toyota Celica | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 725 | Celica |
Year Released | 1980 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.6 mm | 85.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2510 mm |