1980 BMW M1 vs. 2006 Buick Lucerne
To start off, 2006 Buick Lucerne is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 BMW M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 BMW M1 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Buick Lucerne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Buick Lucerne (275 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1980 BMW M1. (273 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Buick Lucerne should accelerate faster than 1980 BMW M1.
Because 1980 BMW M1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 BMW M1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Buick Lucerne, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Buick Lucerne (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 BMW M1. (330 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2006 Buick Lucerne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 BMW M1.
Compare all specifications:
1980 BMW M1 | 2006 Buick Lucerne | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | M1 | Lucerne |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3453 cc | 4572 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2940 mm |