1980 BMW M5 vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 1980 BMW M5 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1980 BMW M5. (218 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 1980 BMW M5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Dodge Polara weights approximately 134 kg more than 1980 BMW M5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 BMW M5 | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
| Make | BMW | Dodge |
| Model | M5 | Polara |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3453 cc | 5905 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 218 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1391 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2960 mm |
