1980 Bristol 412 vs. 1941 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1980 Bristol 412 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1980 Bristol 412.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Bristol 412 | 1941 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 412 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5896 cc | 5676 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3210 mm |
