1980 Bristol 412 vs. 2003 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2003 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 610 kg more than 1980 Bristol 412.
Because 2003 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Bristol 412 | 2003 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Bristol | Toyota |
| Model | 412 | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5896 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 238 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 2300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3010 mm |
