1980 Bristol 412 vs. 2005 Daewoo Rexton
To start off, 2005 Daewoo Rexton is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Daewoo Rexton weights approximately 260 kg more than 1980 Bristol 412.
Because 2005 Daewoo Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Bristol 412 | 2005 Daewoo Rexton | |
| Make | Bristol | Daewoo |
| Model | 412 | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5896 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 215 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2830 mm |
