1980 Bristol 412 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 729 kg more than 1980 Bristol 412.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Bristol 412 | 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
| Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
| Model | 412 | Tahoe |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5896 cc | 5328 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 284 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 2419 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2070 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1970 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2950 mm |
