1980 Bristol 412 vs. 2008 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2008 Dodge Charger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Dodge Charger weights approximately 653 kg more than 1980 Bristol 412.
Because 2008 Dodge Charger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Charger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Bristol 412 | 2008 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Bristol | Dodge |
Model | 412 | Charger |
Year Released | 1980 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5896 cc | 3518 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 250 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 2343 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3050 mm |