1980 Bristol 412 vs. 2011 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac STS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac STS weights approximately 112 kg more than 1980 Bristol 412.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Bristol 412 | 2011 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | 412 | STS |
Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5896 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 302 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1802 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2957 mm |