1980 Bristol 412 vs. 2012 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2012 Ford Explorer is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Explorer weights approximately 377 kg more than 1980 Bristol 412.
Because 1980 Bristol 412 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Bristol 412. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Explorer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Bristol 412 | 2012 Ford Explorer | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 412 | Explorer |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5896 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 290 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 2067 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5006 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2004 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1788 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2860 mm |
