1980 Bristol Britannia vs. 1995 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 1995 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Bristol Britannia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Bristol Britannia would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Bristol Britannia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Bristol Britannia weights approximately 442 kg more than 1995 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 1980 Bristol Britannia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Bristol Britannia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Bristol Britannia | 1995 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | Bristol | Chrysler |
Model | Britannia | Sebring |
Year Released | 1980 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 83.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 76 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 60 L |