1980 Bristol Britannia vs. 2005 GMC Safari
To start off, 2005 GMC Safari is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Bristol Britannia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Bristol Britannia would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Bristol Britannia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Safari weights approximately 289 kg more than 1980 Bristol Britannia.
Because 2005 GMC Safari is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Bristol Britannia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Safari will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Bristol Britannia | 2005 GMC Safari | |
| Make | Bristol | GMC |
| Model | Britannia | Safari |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 4294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 102 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 2041 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 102 L |
