1980 Buick LeSabre vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 4,129 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1980 Buick LeSabre. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1980 Buick LeSabre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 280 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Buick LeSabre (279 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1980 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Buick LeSabre | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
| Model | LeSabre | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4129 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 279 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 100.7 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 75 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5550 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2490 mm |
