1980 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2000 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 755 kg more than 1980 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Buick Skyhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Buick Skyhawk has automatic transmission and 2000 Land Rover Range Rover has manual transmission. 2000 Land Rover Range Rover will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Buick Skyhawk will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Buick Skyhawk | 2000 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Buick | Land Rover |
| Model | Skyhawk | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3789 cc | 3946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2750 mm |
