1980 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2003 Eagle Vision
To start off, 2003 Eagle Vision is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Eagle Vision weights approximately 235 kg more than 1980 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 1980 Buick Skyhawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Buick Skyhawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Buick Skyhawk | 2003 Eagle Vision | |
| Make | Buick | Eagle |
| Model | Skyhawk | Vision |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3789 cc | 2700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1430 mm |
