1980 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1180 kg more than 1980 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Buick Skyhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Buick Skyhawk | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Buick | Land Rover |
Model | Skyhawk | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 2515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2890 mm |