1980 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 133 kg more than 2011 Honda CR-Z.
Because 1980 Buick Skyhawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Buick Skyhawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Buick Skyhawk has automatic transmission and 2011 Honda CR-Z has manual transmission. 2011 Honda CR-Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Buick Skyhawk will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Buick Skyhawk | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Buick | Honda |
Model | Skyhawk | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1202 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2436 mm |