1980 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 583 kg more than 1980 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Buick Skyhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Buick Skyhawk has automatic transmission and 2013 Volvo XC60 has manual transmission. 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Buick Skyhawk will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Buick Skyhawk | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | Skyhawk | XC60 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 321 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1918 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2774 mm |