1980 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1966 Saab 96
To start off, 1980 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Saab 96. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Saab 96 would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1966 Saab 96.
Because 1980 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Saab 96, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Cadillac Brougham | 1966 Saab 96 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Saab |
| Model | Brougham | 96 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2510 mm |
