1980 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1967 Mercury Brougham
To start off, 1980 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Brougham would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Cadillac Brougham | 1967 Mercury Brougham | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
| Model | Brougham | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 6990 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 340 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1990 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3130 mm |
