1980 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1973 Mini MK III
To start off, 1980 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mini MK III would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1338 kg more than 1973 Mini MK III.
Because 1980 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Mini MK III, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Cadillac Brougham | 1973 Mini MK III | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mini |
| Model | Brougham | MK III |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 612 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2040 mm |
