1980 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2004 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2004 Ford Falcon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 435 kg more than 2004 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Cadillac Brougham | 2004 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Brougham | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 3984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 220 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2800 mm |
