1980 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2009 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 93 kg more than 1980 Cadillac Brougham.
Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Cadillac Brougham | 2009 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
| Model | Brougham | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 3778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 2043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2950 mm |
