1980 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2011 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2011 GMC Acadia is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 GMC Acadia weights approximately 162 kg more than 1980 Cadillac Brougham.
Because 1980 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 GMC Acadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Cadillac Brougham | 2011 GMC Acadia | |
| Make | Cadillac | GMC |
| Model | Brougham | Acadia |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 288 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 2112 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5098 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1986 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3020 mm |
