1980 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250
To start off, 1980 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250 would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 370 kg more than 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250.
Because 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250 has manual transmission. 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Cadillac DeVille | 1973 Mercedes-Benz 250 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | DeVille | 250 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6030 cc | 2523 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 130 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 5360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3430 mm |
