1980 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 65 kg more than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Because 2010 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | DeVille | XF |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6030 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 385 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2908 mm |