1980 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1980 Cadillac Eldorado. (143 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1980 Cadillac Eldorado.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Cadillac Eldorado (366 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1980 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Cadillac Eldorado | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Eldorado | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6030 cc | 3727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 269 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2340 mm |