1980 Cadillac Seville vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1980 Cadillac Seville is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Cadillac Seville (123 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 1224 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Cadillac Seville | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Cadillac | DAF |
Model | Seville | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1980 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5735 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 33 L |