1980 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1951 Humber Pullman
To start off, 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chevrolet Camaro (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 587 kg more than 1980 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet Camaro | 1951 Humber Pullman | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Humber |
| Model | Camaro | Pullman |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 4085 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 2032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3330 mm |
