1980 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1960 Mini MK I
To start off, 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mini MK I would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 940 kg more than 1960 Mini MK I.
Because 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet Camaro | 1960 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
| Model | Camaro | MK I |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4097 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2040 mm |
