1980 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 795 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet Camaro | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Camaro | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 4097 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2250 mm |
