1980 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1972 Subaru FF-1
To start off, 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Subaru FF-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Subaru FF-1 would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 860 kg more than 1972 Subaru FF-1.
Because 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Subaru FF-1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet Camaro | 1972 Subaru FF-1 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
| Model | Camaro | FF-1 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4097 cc | 1087 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 52 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 695 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2430 mm |
