1980 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1976 Volvo 240
To start off, 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 215 kg more than 1976 Volvo 240.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet Camaro | 1976 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Camaro | 240 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4097 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2650 mm |